My i tank u 4 so that I understand 2 of begriff concord-its examples Subject and verb concordIf the subject is singular in a sentence, the verb should also be singular. For example, you (singular subject) goes (singular verb), not: you go (in the plural). If the subject is plural, the verb should be plural. Most Slavic languages are very curved, with the exception of Bulgarian and Macedonian. The agreement is similar to Latin, for example. B between adjectives and substants in sex, number, case and animacy (if considered a separate category). The following examples are taken from serbo-Croatian: case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only staff pronouns and case-marking pronouns). A concordance between these pronouns can sometimes be observed: such a concordance is also found with the predictors: the man is great (“man is great”) vs. the chair is large (“the chair is large”).
(In some languages, such as German. B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) Mixed concord, also known as discord, is the combination of a singular verb and a plural pronoun. This structure occurs when there is a significant distance between a name and its modifier and is most often displayed in an informal or spoken language. Discord is motivated when the abstract preference for the meaning of a sentence that agrees with it outweighs the desire for consent of the formal subject-name sentence. In the first statement, the answer “are” is not because two stimuli are, but in the second statement is the right option, “is” is not because you are attracted. Note: Don`t think, because more than one means at least two that you use a plural verb after, no, you will use a single verb – the 24 rules of concord. National ConcordNational Concord will also collectively be nominated. A collective bite: is a nobiss that represents many units forming this single word. “Agreement” is the grammatical phenomenon for example. B in which the shape of a post, as the name “horses. B,” a second point of the phrase, such as the word “gallop,” must appear in some form, that is, the “gallop” must correspond to that of the “horses.” Although concordance phenomena are some of the most familiar and well-studied aspects of grammar, some fundamental questions have rarely been asked, let alone answered. This book develops a theory of the processes of concordance found in language, and studies why verbs agree with subjects in person, adjectives correspond in number and sex, but not the person, and the names do not agree at all.